The new EU design rules are coming

Aurilex • 22 March 2024

The EU has adopted new rules for designs.

According to Article 3 of Regulation 6/2002, designs are delineated as the visual manifestation of an industrial or artisanal product, or a component thereof, distinguished by its lines, contours, colors, shapes, and textures. Presently, design protection can be granted if the design is deemed both novel and possessing individual character.


Under the umbrella of a “design package”, the European Commission introduced two key proposals in November 2022. These proposals mark a pivotal stride toward coherent regulations tailored to the demands of the contemporary digital landscape, aiming for increased efficiency for applicants. The first proposal involves amending the Community Design Regulation, while the second proposes a recast of the Design Directive.


In a recent vote on 12 March 2024, the European Parliament endorsed updated EU design protection rules, positioned to accommodate technological advancements and foster a sustainable economy. The approval of these updated rules, which occurred on December 5, 2023, signifies the Parliament's commitment to preparing EU design regulations for the digital age, as agreed upon with the Council.


Design protection in the digital age


In response to the emergence of novel technologies like 3D printing and artificial intelligence, EU design protection will extend beyond physical objects to encompass visualizations such as graphic representations and spatial arrangements, including animations, maps, and fonts.


While various digital works, including graphical user interfaces, logos, and animated designs, are already eligible for protection under the existing EU design system, the proposed changes seek to clarify the comprehensive scope of the design regime and its relevance in today's digital economy.


Furthermore, the amendments specify that the spatial arrangement of items can be protected, potentially encompassing layouts within establishments, such as shops. The Court of Justice of the European Union (the “CJEU”) has ruled that the representation of the layout of a retail store may, under certain conditions, be registered as a trademark (judgment of 10 July 2014, Case C‑421/13).


However, to safeguard against misuse, this protection excludes designs that replicate aspects of cultural heritage, such as artifacts or natural and cultural monuments.


The growing utilization and advancement of 3D printing underscore the importance of enhancing design rights protection. The Directive expressly clarifies the definition of illicit copying, which now encompasses activities such as creating, downloading, copying, sharing, or distributing any medium or software recording the design and model. This includes facilitating the production of a product incorporating or applying the design or model.


Consequently, once the provisions of the EU design reform package are integrated into the national laws of EU member states, the broader use of software and other mediums for registering designs and models, as well as the commercial reproduction of products via 3D printing, will be prohibited across the EU.


More freedom on the spare parts market


Furthermore, while the primary purpose of design protection is to confer exclusive rights to a product's appearance, the new regulations ensure that this exclusivity does not extend to components of complex products. This provision enables consumers to freely select between competing products for repair purposes and promotes competition in the single market for spare parts. However, manufacturers of components can still provide clear information regarding the commercial origin and identity, empowering consumers to make informed decisions about their preferred spare parts.


Consequently, reproducing protected features of a design for repairing a complex product to restore its original appearance does not constitute an infringement of a Community design. For instance, replacing a damaged car body panel would not infringe on Community design protection, as long as specific conditions are fulfilled.


To facilitate the transition to a sustainable spare parts market, EU countries that continue to protect spare parts designs must withdraw such protection within an accelerated transitional period of eight years, as opposed to ten.


Next step


Both the regulation and directive will come into force on the twentieth day following their publication in the Official Journal. The regulation will become applicable after four months, and member states will have 36 months to transpose the directive into their national systems.

 

by Aurilex 16 April 2025
On April 16, 2025, Christine Chai, partner at Aurilex, was invited to speak at the seminar “ China–Europe Intellectual Property Protection in Practice: A Dual Perspective on Compliance and Risk Mitigation ,” jointly organized by Aurilex and Shanghai Sunhold Law Firm. The event brought together legal professionals from both Europe and China, offering in-depth analysis and practical guidance for companies navigating intellectual property (IP) protection across borders. As the representative speaker on European IP practice, Christine Chai delivered a detailed presentation covering the legal frameworks, registration strategies, and enforcement challenges businesses typically face when entering the European market. Navigating Dual Systems: EU-Wide vs. National IP Protections Christine highlighted the complexity of Europe’s IP system, which combines EU-wide mechanisms (such as EUTM and EPO filings) with country-specific rules. She emphasized the importance for businesses to align their IP strategies with this dual-layered structure. “For example,” she noted, “the actual use requirement under the EU Trademark Regulation means that companies must plan not only for registration but for active, timely use in the market.” Trade Fair Injunctions: A Real and Growing Risk Christine also warned Chinese companies about the increasing use of emergency injunctions during trade fairs in France and other EU countries. “There have been multiple cases where exhibitors faced injunctions on-site, resulting in booth closures and seizure of displayed goods. Without preemptive IP audits, companies expose themselves to serious operational disruptions,” she explained. The UPC: Centralization Comes with Strategy Shifts Addressing recent developments, Christine discussed the impact of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) on enforcement strategy in Europe. While the UPC offers streamlined litigation across multiple EU member states, it also requires companies to make deliberate choices between centralized and national enforcement routes. Joint Dialogue: Cross-Border Action Checklists During the joint dialogue session, Christine collaborated with the Chinese legal team to provide practical compliance checklists for cross-border business activities. She advised Chinese companies to: Conduct prior trademark and patent clearance in target EU countries; Evaluate whether to opt in or out of the UPC system; Prepare legal strategies in case of emergency injunctions or enforcement challenges. Likewise, she shared insights for European companies expanding into China, particularly on navigating local IP enforcement procedures and understanding the nuances of evidence collection in cases involving trade secrets. This seminar highlighted the increasing importance of IP compliance in cross-border business, especially as more Chinese companies “go global” and more European businesses expand into China. Aurilex remains committed to providing in-depth legal support tailored to the needs of international clients operating across jurisdictions.
by Aurilex 31 January 2025
Aurilex Recognized in WTR 1000: Leading Trademark Professional in 2025
by Aurilex 27 November 2024
EU design views must be consistent to be valid. A recent decision of the General Court of the EU confirms this requirement.
by Aurilex 11 November 2024
The General Court clarifies the evidence requirement for trademark use in the EU trademark law in a recent judgement.
by Aurilex 26 July 2024
One hundred years ago, from May 4 to July 27, 1924, the eighth Olympiad of the modern era was held in Paris. Already at that time, the International Olympic Committee paid attention to the protection of the Olympic intellectual properties. Below is the trademark filed in 1924 for the Olympic Games in Paris.
by Aurilex 8 July 2024
The departing question of this legal issue is as follows: does a distillery company, which only fills labeled bottles provides by a third party, infringe the trademark of others, if it turns out that the label provided by the third party is a trademark infringement?
by Aurilex 13 May 2024
Lesson from M&M's: Attention by changing the brand!
designer's right, trademark right, trademark protection, intellecutal property in France
by Aurilex 21 April 2024
After the end of collaboration, can the company still use a designer's name as a trademark ?
artificial intelligence, EU AI Act
by Aurilex 1 April 2024
The New EU AI Act will bring changes for artificial intelligence companies coming into the European Union.
More posts